Life
Linden Family Income Shield
A household with one main wage and a long school horizon asked what “enough” life cover meant.
Read the noteProjects
Home / Projects
Guidance in practice
Coverage Projects
These project notes are illustrative composites. They show how a Rotten Royals conversation is structured. Names and figures are examples, not reports of a particular client’s policy or claim.
Home
Maple Court Contents Reset
Owners discovered their contents sum described a house they had not lived in for years.
Read the note
Auto
Second Driver, Same Car
A newly licensed driver joined a household that had been insuring one careful commuter.
Read the note
Business
Harbor Workshop Fleet
A small workshop used two vans for tools and deliveries and had them on a personal auto form.
Read the note
Health
Northline Clinic Staff Notes
A clinic wanted staff to understand the health plan before enrolment week, not during it.
Read the note
Travel
Solace Travel Circle
A group of friends taking one long trip needed day limits explained before anyone paid.
Read the noteLife project
Linden Family Income Shield
The Linden household, in this example, had a mortgage, two school-age children, and one income that paid almost every monthly bill. They had been offered a round number for life cover by a well-meaning relative. The number was large, memorable, and unconnected to their actual costs.
Amara started with twelve months of bills, then the years until the younger child would finish school, then the debts that would not die with a salary. Savings and the surviving partner’s own earning power were subtracted, not ignored. The result was a range, not a single dramatic figure. Term cover matched the range better than a permanent policy they could not keep paying if work slowed down.
The recap listed who would receive funds, why the term ended when it did, and which questions on a future application needed careful answers. The household did not leave with a policy in hand. They left able to recognise a fitting quote and reject a flattering one.
Home project
Maple Court Contents Reset
The example owners at Maple Court had renewed a home policy for seven years by paying the same contents sum. In that time they had added instruments, work laptops, and a shed full of tools. The building sum had been updated once. The contents sum still described their first year in the house.
Elena walked the rooms as categories: furniture, electronics, clothing, tools, and items that might need to be named. Two instruments sat above a general single-item limit. They were written down separately so a future quote would not hide them inside a friendly total. The owners also learned that a room used sometimes for paid lessons might push stock and liability toward a business conversation with Nora.
The project outcome was a contents inventory short enough to maintain, a note on rebuilding cost versus sale price, and a list of water and vacancy questions to ask before the next storm season.
Auto project
Second Driver, Same Car
A parent in this example wanted a seventeen-year-old added “just for practice” on evenings. The existing policy had been priced for one experienced commuter. Adding a driver is not a courtesy. It is a change of risk, and leaving it undeclared is how a later claim becomes an argument.
Julian listed every person who might take the keys, including a partner who used the car on weekends. He separated liability limits from the cover that repairs the household’s own car, and he asked whether the family could pay the deductible they had chosen when money was easier. The deductible was lowered in the quote request because the old one only worked on paper.
The recap told them what to tell the insurer, in what order, and which sentence on the quote should name the new driver out loud. Practice miles were treated as real miles.
Business project
Harbor Workshop Fleet
Harbor Workshop, as a composite, employed four people and ran two vans that carried tools to job sites. The vans were still described on a personal auto application from the year the founder worked alone. Tools lived in the vans overnight. A client’s hallway had been damaged the previous spring, and the founder had paid for it from the business account because nobody was sure which policy, if any, applied.
Nora split the problem into three covers: vehicles used for work, tools and stock, and liability for damage at a client’s place. Julian joined the vehicle portion so the drivers and the business use were not written twice in conflicting ways. The recap showed the founder which certificate a commercial client might demand and which loss that certificate would still not pay.
The workshop did not need every product on a business menu. It needed the three that matched Tuesday and the bad Tuesday. That editing is the project.
Health project
Northline Clinic Staff Notes
Northline Clinic’s coordinator asked for a plain briefing before staff chose a health plan. People had been circling a familiar hospital and missing that everyday clinicians sat in a different network. Enrolment week had become a week of rumours.
Marcus built a one-page comparison of hospital care, routine visits, and medicines, using the same three examples for every option: a planned procedure, a child’s ordinary illness, and a prescription someone already relied on. He did not tell anyone which clinician to see. He showed where a bill might land if they did.
The project delivered a briefing the coordinator could read aloud and a list of questions staff could ask the plan directly. Rumour gave way to a sheet of paper.
Travel project
Solace Travel Circle
Six friends planned a six-week trip with shared bookings and separate bank cards. Two of them had bought an annual travel policy for weekend breaks. The day limit on that policy ended before the trip did. They assumed “annual” meant “all year, any length.”
Owen put the dates on a single line and marked the day each existing policy would stop caring. Cancellation was separated from medical care away from home and from baggage. One traveller needed regular medication, so the existing-condition questions were written out before anyone clicked buy. Activities on the itinerary were checked against common sports exclusions.
The circle left with a shared checklist and individual quote requests. Friendship did not require them to share one unsuitable policy.